Karman Line Annexation

June 17th, 2025 – Colorado Springs residents will be asked to vote on the Karman Line Annexation.  Ballots are dropping soon!

The El Paso County Democrats Executive Committee has taken a firm stance against the Karman Line Annexation. By voting to oppose this measure, the committee underscores its commitment to sustainable development and protecting the interests of Colorado Springs residents. This decision reflects the growing concerns over the annexation’s potential to burden taxpayers, strain resources, and disrupt the community’s balance.

Karman Line Annexation: A Controversial Proposal in Colorado Springs

The Karman Line Annexation is a highly debated plan to annex 1,900 acres in Colorado Springs for a new development near Schriever Space Force Base. If approved, this project would introduce approximately 6,500 new homes, dramatically expanding the area south of the base, near Curtis and Bradley Roads.

The Urgent Need for Housing

Housing is a critical issue in Colorado Springs, and the El Paso County Democrats recognize the need for increased residential development. However, sustainability must be prioritized. This proposal places the burden of infrastructure—such as water supply, emergency services, and roads—on Colorado Springs, rather than ensuring responsible, independent development. Shifting these costs onto the city’s taxpayers has been labeled predatory planning by critics.

Standing with Farmers & the Community

Concerns have also been raised by Arkansas River Valley farmers, who worry about the effects of rapid expansion. Advocates for more sustainable urban planning argue that increasing urban density—rather than sprawling development on small parcels—would be a more responsible solution.

The Path to a Vote

Despite strong public opposition, the Colorado Springs Council approved the annexation on January 28. In response, a campaign was launched to bring the issue to voters. After successfully gathering the necessary signatures, the measure is now set to appear in a special election, allowing residents to decide the future of this development.

While supporting affordable housing for active-duty military members is a shared priority, opponents argue that this plan fails to serve the best interests of the county due to its unsustainable structure.